Screenshots:
Description
People also like
Reviews
-
Maybe I am stupid, but it did not work for me by Richard
I choose a folder full of duplicate music. The program found almost none of them . I clicked help, their website appeared, but there was no way i could find to contact support. All In can say is I just wasted $10. , Maybe it will work great for , it gets a lot of positive reviews, . but having no link on their website for support, that i could find, well,why is that?
-
Best App In App Store by charles
I have tried so many duplicate photo apps in the app store which were horrible, not to mention the cost. I then stumbled on this app, feeling desperate-low expectations I clicked that buy button. I think angels were singing the first used it. Disko is easy to use, no dumb excessive folders. OMG, cleans your multible folders with no false positives. It is fun to use!
-
Easy by joe
Easy, quick. You seem to have to do one folder, then relaunch the app to do another folder. But this takes only a moment. When deleting files (I had hundreds of duplicate pix) a progress bar would be nice. But I tried other dup finders before this one, and this seemed easiest, especially for pictures. I saved 15gb, significant for a 256gb drive.
-
not to crazy for the name by jesse
about time someone created an app that's so easy to use, and it does what it says it going to do. find all the duplicates on hand. tried the other ones and they work, but not without crashing. well done....
-
Great little program by Eric
Found lots of duplicates. Also found some that it thought were duplicates. Product suggestion, I should be able to right click on the file and open it to verify that it really is a duplicate.
-
The delete button does nothing by Kendall
The app found lots of small duplicate files, pretty fast. But when I click the X to delete the selected files, nothing happens...
-
Warning! Scanned .tif files gave false matches. by George
I had three photos that had been scanned in to create three .TIF files with same name except for the last digit which was a sequence number. The scanner scanned the negatives and produced three identically spec'd files except for the name. In response to your question, The properties info was exactly and the sequence number was a single digit. File names were "Italy Anna with birds kodak1, Italy Anna with birds kodak6, and Italy Anna with birds kodak7". The property details were the same for all three. I had some pictures that worked fine and the only difference I could see was that I used a different name, IE: (fd001, fd002 etc.) instead of just the appended digit. I believe the scanner software added the digit for each picture.